|
November 26, 2003
|
For the writing workshop I took a couple months ago, I was assigned to read the first book in the Harry Potter series. I read it. I liked it. Nothing great, but it was pretty good. Good enough for me to decide that I'd go ahead and read the others in the series when I had a chance.
Eventually, I got the chance, and I read book two. It was quite good. So I read book three. It was *wonderful*. So now I'm reading book four.
Book four is kinda funny in that, after I was 240 pages into it, the main conflict was just finally set into motion.
Don't get me wrong: the first 240 pages had a lot going on, and the writing was very smooth, and each scene and situation pulled me seamlessly to the next. But I was beginning to wonder when we were going to get to the meat of the matter, when it finally got set up in the mid 200's.
No biggie. I enjoyed the reading experience. But once the meat of the matter was introduced, the story began to absolutely sing. The author's storytelling just gets better and better.
My favorite aspect, both as a reader and as a writer who wants to improve his craft is the way the author handles plot reversals. I have mentioned elsewhere on this website (here, in fact) Connie Willis's lecture on plot devices from when I was at Clarion West, but I'll recap my interpretation of what she said on the subject:
In a "reversal", the plot or action suddenly veers off in another direction from what was expected. The reversal can be good *or* bad. It doesn't always have to be bad. A really good reversal changes the goals/questions for the characters involved.
In Harry Potter Book Four, the reversals frequently change the goals for the characters, and they are very, very well done. I'm impressed, also, with the way the author raises the stakes each time.
But that said, the author also introduced an interesting plot problem (for me) in the form of a universal get out of jail free card.
I'm about to comment on a few specific plot points in the novel. If you don't want to read about them (ie, if you haven't read the novel and don't want to spoil it for when you finally get around to reading), then don't read the rest of today's entry.
SPOILERS and a rant:
Harry, at one point, is given the task of snatching a golden egg away from the protective custody of a fire-breathing dragon. In order to do this, he must begin the task armed only with his magic wand. But, a-ha! Harry has been taught how to use his magic wand to "summon" other objects. So, he summons his super duper broomstick from way back in his dorm room, the broomstick arrives, and he flies around the dragon, distracts it away, and snatches the golden egg. Voila, Harry has completed the task without getting killed.
I may have made it too obvious here by the way I explained it, but can you see the problem here?
If Harry can summon things with his wand, why would he summon his broomstick so that he can fly all around a dangerous dragon? Why not just summon the f-ing egg in the first place?
A ha!
But the problem persists. Harry is later given another task where he must go to the bottom of a lake to rescue his friend from the custody of mermaids and mermen. So he tries to figure out how to get down to rescue his friend. DUH! Why doesn't he just use his wand to summon his friend up, instead?!
The author may not have realized it at the time, but she gave Harry a tool that will enable him to get out of just about any jam he could get into. It's like giving the Starship Enterprise a freakin' transporter and replicators!
I am learning a lot just by seeing what the author does so well with regard to plot reversals. (In fact, the way Harry's friend ends up snatched by the merpeople is very nicely done and totally changes Harry's goals and his mindset in a way that definitely engaged me.)
But I have also learned another valuable lesson: think about the consequences of any powers/resources you give your main character, and make sure that they don't subvert your later plans just to get out of a jam now.
Posted by on November 26, 2003 04:56 PM in the following Department(s): Books/Movies/Music
|
Comments
|
Thanks for "reviewing" the Potter series. I read the first and said, "Eh, it works better as a movie." I'll try the subsequent books since you think they're better.
As for the Deus Ex Machina aspect of the wand, even the best fantasy novels can have those problems. If your air conditioning ever breaks invite the Tolkien fan club over and ask them, "If the eagles were able to rescue Frodo from Mount Doom, why couldn't they just have taken him there in the first place." The subsequent hand waving will cool your house in no time.
Posted by: Peter Schoaff on November 27, 2003 5:06 AMYou know, I have read that book at least three times and never even realized that. but you're absolutely right. made me laugh out loud.
Rowling does something similar in Book 5 (which I will not spoil for you) where I was thinking "Now wait, if X is true, then why didn't he just Z?"
Posted by: Tempest on December 1, 2003 2:43 PMSometimes, thinking "if X is true, why not do Y?" whilst reading through the plot isn't an indication of a logical hole in the story's universe, just in the author's presentation.
I read possibly far too much of, and into, some of the stories above.
The Eagles couldn't fly the ring into Mt. Doom, because Sauron would have seen them on the way in, and Nazgul (the dragon things) would have put up strong resistance (even though the tables seemed to be reversed in the film, any delay whilst carrying the Ring would probably be fatal). Sauron is well aware of the Eagles, they've been keeping an eye on his (and his master's) misdemeanors for several thousand years - plenty of time for effective countermeasures to be set up.
And as for Harry's summoning spell, it's been a few months since I've read the book, but perhaps he can only summon things that he could ordinarily carry (ruling out his friend), and that he's familiar with (ruling out the egg). To clarify this, the spell would have needed more plot setup and exposition, which might not have made for interesting reading - also don't forget that Harry is learning about his world as he grows up, so perhaps he simply didn't think of doing the most logical thing, because he's a kid, and was acting under pressure?
:-)
But the writing aspect would be to not just check for logical uber-powers, but to make sure that you don't accidentally excise the explanation of the limits when trying to trim the finished product!
Posted by: Father of a different Alexander Benjamin on January 4, 2004 12:24 PMIncidentally, my problem with the use of the summoning spell was handled effectively in the recent movie that was based upon this book. One sentence was all it took to close this major loophole.
Posted by: Allan on March 12, 2006 3:02 AM|
Post a comment
|
Copyright (c)1998 - 2010 by Allan Rousselle. All rights reserved, all wrongs reversed, all reservations righted, all right, already.
Click here to send me mail.
